JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, T R
Right arrow Articles by Elder, J H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, T R
Right arrow Articles by Elder, J H
J Virol. 1990 October; 64(10): 4605-4613

Comparison of two host cell range variants of feline immunodeficiency virus.

T R Phillips, R L Talbott, C Lamont, S Muir, K Lovelace and J H Elder

Department of Molecular Biology, Scripps Clinic and Research Foundation, La Jolla, California 92037.

ABSTRACT

Two molecular clones of feline immunodeficiency virus were compared. The first clone, 34TF10, was from a Petaluma, Calif., isolate; the second, PPR, was isolated from a cat in the San Diego, Calif., area. The cats from which the isolates were obtained suffered from chronic debilitating illnesses. The two molecular clones differed in their in vitro host cell range. The 34TF10 clone infected the Crandall feline kidney and G355-5 cell lines, but replicated less efficiently on feline peripheral blood leukocytes. In contrast, the PPR clone productively infected the primary feline peripheral blood leukocytes but not Crandall feline kidney or G355-5 cells. The 34TF10 and PPR clones had an overall sequence identity of 91%. The env gene was the least conserved (85% at the amino acid level). Additionally, the potential open reading frame for a Tat-like protein, ORF 2, contained a stop codon in the 34TF10 isolate which was not found in the PPR clone. This truncation did not prevent in vitro or in vivo replication of 34TF10. Two splice acceptor sites were identified in the 34TF10 clone. One was 5' to the beginning of the putative tat open reading frame, and the other was 5' to the putative vif product. Both of these acceptor sites were conserved in the PPR clone. The long terminal repeats of the viruses were 7% divergent between the two clones, with a lack of conservation in putative NF-kappa B, LBP-1, and CCAAT enhancer-promoter sites.

J Virol. 1990 October; 64(10): 4605-4613




This article has been cited by other articles:



Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1990 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.