JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Herbst, R S
Right arrow Articles by Babiss, L E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Herbst, R S
Right arrow Articles by Babiss, L E

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Virol. 1990 January; 64(1): 161-172

The state of cellular differentiation determines the activity of the adenovirus E1A enhancer element: evidence for negative regulation of enhancer function.

R S Herbst, M Pelletier, E M Boczko and L E Babiss

Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021.

ABSTRACT

Most of the eucaryotic enhancer elements so far described consist of multiple DNA binding sites for proteins that act either synergistically or antagonistically to modulate the rate of transcription. In this report, we show that the activity of the adenovirus E1A enhancer element is suppressed in virus-infected undifferentiated rodent fetal fibroblast cells (CREF and F111 cells) and primary rat liver hepatocytes that have lost their fully differentiated phenotype (dedifferentiated). This contrasts with the results obtained for virus-infected differentiated or partially dedifferentiated rodent hepatocytes or hepatoma cell lines and human HeLa cells, in which deletion of the E1A enhancer domain greatly reduces the rate of E1A gene transcription. An in vitro quantitation of the nuclear proteins (from HeLa and CREF cells) that interact with and modulate the activity of the E1A enhancer revealed similar binding activities for the E2f and ATF proteins. However, an AP3-like (phi AP3) activity was present at a 10- to 20-fold higher concentration in CREF cells than in HeLa cells, and removal of this phi AP3-binding site on the viral genome resulted in an increase in the rate of E1A gene transcription in virus-infected CREF cells. Together, these results demonstrated that the factors which positively regulate enhancer function were present in CREF cells and that the phi AP3 factor was acting to suppress the activity of the E1A enhancer. Furthermore, the level of this factor was found to increase to even higher levels in CREF cells treated with 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate, and this induction resulted in a further suppression in the rate of E1A gene transcription. On the basis of these observations, we propose that E1A expression is negatively regulated by the phi AP3 factor in undifferentiated rodent fetal fibroblast cells and that this could be an important mechanism that distinguishes between establishment of the differentiated cell versus transformed cell phenotypes.


J Virol. 1990 January; 64(1): 161-172




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1990 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.