JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ludlow, J W
Right arrow Articles by Consigli, R A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ludlow, J W
Right arrow Articles by Consigli, R A

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Virol. 1987 February; 61(2): 509-515

Differences in biological activity and structural protein VP1 phosphorylation of polyomavirus progeny resulting from infection of primary mouse kidney and primary mouse embryo cell cultures.

J W Ludlow and R A Consigli

ABSTRACT

Both primary mouse kidney and primary mouse embryo cells in culture were used for polyomavirus progeny production. Examination of polyomavirus virion structural integrity revealed that mouse embryo cell progeny contained a threefold greater population of unstable particles when compared with mouse kidney cell progeny. Differences in biological activity between these two progeny virion types were also shown. Mouse kidney cell progeny compared with mouse embryo cell progeny exhibited a 10-fold greater ability to agglutinate guinea pig erythrocytes, a 3-fold lower ability to become internalized into monopinocytotic vesicles, and a 2-fold lower ability to initiate a productive infection based on positive nuclear immunofluorescence when mouse embryo host cell cultures were used. The mouse kidney progeny were also found to bind to host cells less specifically than the mouse embryo cell progeny. When these two progeny virion types were labeled in vivo with 32P and subjected to isoelectric focusing followed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophroesis in the second dimension, differences in the phosphorylation pattern of the major virus-encoded structural protein VP1 species were observed. It was revealed that species D and E of mouse kidney cell progeny were phosphorylated to the same degree, while mouse embryo cell progeny species E and F were phosphorylated equally. These data suggest that the host cells play a role in modulating the biological activity of the virus by affecting the degree and site-specific phosphorylation of the major capsid protein VP1 which may influence the recognition of virus attachment proteins for specific cellular receptors.


J Virol. 1987 February; 61(2): 509-515




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1987 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.