JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ashley, R
Right arrow Articles by Corey, L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ashley, R
Right arrow Articles by Corey, L
J Virol. 1987 February; 61(2): 264-268

Detection of asymptomatic herpes simplex virus infections after vaccination.

R Ashley, G J Mertz and L Corey

ABSTRACT

Twenty-two volunteers seronegative for antibodies to herpes simplex virus (HSV) were enrolled in a trial to determine tolerance and immunogenicity of an HSV-2 glycoprotein subunit vaccine. Vaccine was administered at days 0, 28, and 140, and sera were obtained on days 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 49, 56, 140, 147, and 365 for determination of HSV neutralizing antibody activity and antibody-dependent cell cytotoxicity (ADCC). Sera were also tested by immunoprecipitation of radiolabeled HSV-2-infected cell proteins and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis to identify the viral proteins which elicited antibody responses in vaccine recipients. After vaccination two male volunteers presented with atypical first-episode genital herpes: patient 1 with a culture-negative genital lesion at day 53 and patient 3 with urethritis at day 68. Seroconversion to wild-type viral proteins not present in the vaccine was detectable by radioimmunoprecipitation-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis within 10 days in both patients. Two additional volunteers, one a sex contact of patient 1, seroconverted asymptomatically to nonvaccine proteins during the trial. All four vaccine breakthrough patients were indistinguishable from the other volunteers in the time required to develop neutralizing and ADCC antibodies, in the titer of these antibodies, and the time to seroconversion to gB and gD vaccine proteins. However, only one of the four breakthrough patients had antibodies to g80 (a complex of gC-2 and gE) after vaccination as compared with 15 of the other 18 volunteers (P = 0.05). Neither neutralizing antibody nor ADCC titers consistently identified acquisition of wild-type viral infection; therefore, protein-specific serologies were required to detect wild-type antibodies in these four patients. These data underscore the importance of using serologic assays which will distinguish naturally acquired infection from the immune response to vaccination.


J Virol. 1987 February; 61(2): 264-268







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1987 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.