JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Embretson, J E
Right arrow Articles by Temin, H M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Embretson, J E
Right arrow Articles by Temin, H M
J Virol. 1987 November; 61(11): 3454-3462

Transcription from a spleen necrosis virus 5' long terminal repeat is suppressed in mouse cells.

J E Embretson and H M Temin

McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison 53706.

ABSTRACT

To determine the block(s) to spleen necrosis virus (SNV) replication in mouse cells, we studied the expression of a dominant selectable marker, neo, or a gene whose product is easily assayed, the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (cat) gene, in SNV-derived and murine leukemia virus-derived vectors. Using transient (CAT) and stable (Neor phenotype) transfection assays, we showed that the SNV promoter was used in mouse cells only when the 3' SNV long terminal repeat (LTR) was absent. Infection of mouse cells with recombinant SNV viruses was 1% as efficient as infection of permissive dog (D17) cells. The SNV proviruses in mouse cells appeared normal by Southern blot analysis, indicating that their integration probably occurred by normal mechanisms. S1 nuclease analyses of Neor mouse cell clones, each harboring a single recombinant SNV provirus, showed that the selected (internal) promoter was active, but that the 5' SNV LTR promoter was not. However, in the rare (less than 10(-6)) Neor colonies in which expression of the 5' LTR was selected, both promoters were active. Thus, the block to SNV infection of mouse cells is at least at two levels; one is a 100-fold-decreased efficiency at some step(s) up to and including integration, and the other is at transcription.


J Virol. 1987 November; 61(11): 3454-3462




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1987 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.