JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Levantis, P
Right arrow Articles by Wyke, J A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Levantis, P
Right arrow Articles by Wyke, J A

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Virol. 1986 March; 57(3): 907-916

Control of expression of an integrated Rous sarcoma provirus in rat cells: role of 5' genomic duplications reveals unexpected patterns of gene transcription and its regulation.

P Levantis, D A Gillespie, K Hart, M J Bissell and J A Wyke

ABSTRACT

Rat cells transformed by Rous sarcoma virus frequently contain duplications of viral (and sometimes cellular) DNA 5' to the integrated provirus, suggesting that such rearrangements favor provirus expression. In one cell line, A11, the duplication includes the viral src gene and proviral sequences that flank it. We examined three possible roles for this structure. Since the proviral v-src gene transformed recipient cells upon DNA transfer and was the major template for v-src transcription in A11 cells, the presence of v-src in the duplication is presumably not necessary for transformation. Since the size and structure of transcripts from the proviral v-src gene in A11 cells were conventional, the duplication does not facilitate transformation by providing a novel transcriptional strategy. Thus, we favor the concept that the duplication either attenuates a negative effect of flanking elements at the host chromosome integration site or augments the positive regulation of conventional provirus expression or both. Gene transfer and transcription analyses with both genomic and cloned DNA showed that the mechanisms of such regulatory phenomena are complex. Identical sequences in the provirus and the 5' duplication displayed different patterns of expression in A11 cells that could be disrupted in segments of cloned DNA. Among the elements that influenced such expression were sequences from the gag-pol region of the provirus.


J Virol. 1986 March; 57(3): 907-916







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1986 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.