JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simmons, A
Right arrow Articles by Nash, A A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Simmons, A
Right arrow Articles by Nash, A A

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Virol. 1985 March; 53(3): 944-948

Role of antibody in primary and recurrent herpes simplex virus infection.

A Simmons and A A Nash

ABSTRACT

When herpes simplex virus was inoculated into the flank of a BALB/c mouse by scarification, the local replication of virus was followed by the establishment of an acute ganglionic infection. The subsequent centrifugal spread of this virus along nerves to the skin of the whole dermatome led to the development of a bandlike "zosteriform" rash. This represents a highly reproducible system in which virus travels through the nervous system synchronously in large numbers of animals. The transection of peripheral nerves at various times after infection showed that the virus had completed the round trip 60 h after inoculation into the upper flank and was detectable as infectious virus by 74 h postinfection. After the administration of virus, neutralizing but not nonneutralizing antibodies prevented the development of the zosteriform rash. The target epitopes of the protective antibodies were not confined to a single glycoprotein. Neutralizing antibody was effective even when given up to 60 h postinfection and was protective even when administered after sensory neurotomy at this time. Antibody was therefore able to prevent clinically and virologically detectable infection of the skin, presumably by acting peripherally on virus emerging from nerve endings. A quantitative estimate of the action of one of the neutralizing monoclonal antibody preparations, AP7, showed that high titers (several times higher than those normally found in immune mice) were needed to prevent this type of infection. These results are discussed in relation to antibody prophylaxis.


J Virol. 1985 March; 53(3): 944-948




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1985 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.