This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Korngold, R Articles by Doherty, P C Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Korngold, R Articles by Doherty, P C

Treatment of mice with polyinosinic-polycytidilic polyribonucleotide reduces T-cell involvement in a localized inflammatory response to vaccinia virus challenge.

ABSTRACT

Mice inoculated intracerebrally with 10(3) PFU of vaccinia virus developed a nonfatal meningitis which was maximal 7 days after challenge. Intravenous administration of an interferon (IFN) inducer, polyinosinic-polycytidilic polyribonucleotide [poly(I)-poly(C)], on days 4 and 6 postinjection was associated with a three- to fourfold decrease in the number of T lymphocytes present in cerebrospinal fluid, reflected primarily by a decreased number of vaccinia virus-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte precursors. The lack of a concomitant reduction in the overall cytotoxic activity of cerebrospinal fluid cells directed against virus-infected target cells seemed to be largely due to an increase in natural killer cell activity. IFN was implicated as mediating the effect of poly(I)-poly(C) because high systemic levels of IFN were evident after injection, and neither the magnitude of the inflammatory response nor the T-cell levels were affected when poly(I)-poly(C)-treated mice were also given anti-IFN antiserum. However, the poly(I)-poly(C)-induced IFN did not seem to reduce the localized inflammatory response by affecting viral replication in brain tissue because the vaccinia virus titers present on days 6 through 8 of infection were similar to the titers in phosphate-buffered saline controls. These findings are consistent with either an effect of IFN on T-cell recruitment to the central nervous system or an inhibition of proliferation of cells participating in the response. These findings suggest that there is a potential source of complications for clinical protocols that use IFN or inducers to enhance T-cell function in various disease situations, and this effect of IFN may be a contributing factor to the immunosuppression often associated with many viral infections.