JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kuhn, A H
Right arrow Articles by Hausmann, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kuhn, A H
Right arrow Articles by Hausmann, R

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

J Virol. 1982 February; 41(2): 657-673

Involvement of the bacterial groM gene product in bacteriophage T7 reproduction. I. Arrest at the level of DNA packaging.

A H Kuhn, M L Moncany, E Kellenberger and R Hausmann

ABSTRACT

The multiplication of bacteriophage T7 is blocked in Escherichia coli M. The genetic determinant of this ability (groM) to inhibit T7 growth was transferred to an E. coli K-12 recipient by means of conjugation. We determined at which precise step T7 maturation is blocked. Phage-directed protein and DNA synthesis as well as degradation of host DNA were not qualitatively affected. Instead of infective phages, only preheads were produced. These, however, were maturable in vitro. The newly synthesized phage DNA accumulated in a concatemeric form and matured from its tetrameric or longer forms (very fast sedimenting DNA) only into its dimeric form (fast-sedimenting DNA) or longer forms. The following step, i.e., the maturation of the dimeric to unit-length DNA, was not observed. Since the concatemeric form of T7 DNA accumulated in spite of the presence of maturable preheads, it is likely that the maturation process was blocked at the level of DNA packaging. As intermediates in the packaging process, we found some prehead-DNA complexes. We interpreted these as true assembly intermediates (or breakdown products thereof), since the attached DNA was still in its concatemeric form. This shows that the very first DNA packaging step, the binding of the progeny DNA to the preheads, was obviously not blocked. Rather, a later step, such as the filling of the preheads with T7 DNA or the stabilization of completely packaged particles (i.e., the final cutting of the concatemers into unit-size length), was inhibited.


J Virol. 1982 February; 41(2): 657-673







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1982 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.