Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
J Virol. 1980 February; 33(2): 887-901
Department of Virology and Epidemiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030
ABSTRACT
Antisera were prepared in syngeneic hosts against subcellular fractions of simian virus 40 (SV40)-transformed cells (Mo
PM, Mo
Nuc), glutaraldehydefixed SV40-transformed cells (Ha
H-50-G, Mo
VLM-G), and electrophoretically purified denatured SV40 tumor antigen (T-ag) (Ra
T). Immune sera were also collected from animals bearing tumors induced by SV40-transformed cells (Ha
T, Mo
T, HAF) and from SV40-immunized animals that had rejected a transplant of SV40-transformed cells (Ha
S, Mo
S). Immunological reagents prepared against cell surface (Mo
PM, Ha
S, Mo
S, Ha
H-50-G, Mo
VLM-G) reacted exclusively with the surface of SV40-transformed cells by indirect immunofluorescence or protein A surface antigen radioimmunoassay. Immunological reagents prepared against the nuclear fraction (Mo
Nuc) or whole-cell determinants (Ha
T, Mo
T, HAF, Ra
T) reacted with both the nuclei and surface of SV40-transformed or -infected cells. All reagents were capable of immunoprecipitating 96,000-molecular weight large T-ag from solubilized whole cell extracts of SV40-transformed cells. The exclusive surface reactivity of Ha
S exhibited in immunofluorescence tests was abolished by solubilization of subcellular fractions, which then allowed immunoprecipitation of T-ag by Ha
S from both nuclear and plasma membrane preparations. Specificity was established by the fact that all T-reactive reagents failed to react in serological tests against chemically transformed mouse cells, and sera from mice bearing transplants chemically transformed mouse cells (Mo
DMBA-2) failed to react with SV40-transformed mouse or hamster cells. Reagents demonstrating positive surface immunofluorescence and protein A radioimmunoassay reactions against SV40-transformed cells were capable of blocking the surface binding of Ra
T to SV40-transformed cells in a double-antibody surface antigen radioimmunoassay. This blocking ability demonstrated directly that a component specificity of each surface-reactive reagent is directed against SV40 T-ag. A model is presented which postulates that the differential detection of T-ag by the various serological reagents is a reflection of immunogenic and antigenic differences between T-ag polypeptides localized in nuclei and plasma membranes.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| J. Bacteriol. | Mol. Cell. Biol. | Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. |
|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|