This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Leschine, S B Articles by Jacobson, L A Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Leschine, S B Articles by Jacobson, L A

Control of protein synthesis in Escherichia coli: control of bacteriophage Q beta coat protein synthesis after energy source shift-down.

ABSTRACT

Escherichia coli Q13 was infected with bacteriophage Q beta and subjected to energy source shift-down (from glucose-minimal to succinate-minimal medium) 20 min after infection. Production of progeny phage was about fourfold slower in down-shifted cultures than in the cultures in glucose medium. Shift-down did not affect the rate of phage RNA replication, as measured by the rate of incorporation of [14C]uracil in the presence of rifampin, with appropriate correction for the reduced entry of exogenous uracil into the UTP pool. Phage coat protein synthesis was three- to sixfold slower in down-shifted cells than in exponentially growing cells, as determined by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate. The polypeptide chain propagation rate in infected cells was unaffected by the down-shift. Thus, the reduced production of progeny phage in down-shifted cells appears to result from control of phage protein synthesis at the level of initiation of translation. The reduction in the rate of Q beta coat protein synthesis is comparable to the previously described reduction in the rate of synthesis of total E. coli protein and of beta-galactosidase, implying that the mechanism which inhibits translation in down-shifted cells is neither messenger specific nor specific for 5' proximal cistrons. The intracellular ATP pool size was nearly constant after shift-down; general energy depletion is thus not a predominant factor. The GTP pool, by contrast, declined by about 40%. Also, ppGpp did not accumulate in down-shifted, infected cells in the presence of rifampin, indicating that ppGpp is not the primary effector of this translational inhibition.