This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Reprints and Permissions Copyright Information Books from ASM Press MicrobeWorld Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tyndall, C Articles by Bellett, A J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tyndall, C Articles by Bellett, A J

Some adenovirus DNA is associated with the DNA of permissive cells during productive or restricted growth.

ABSTRACT

We have investigated the association of viral DNA with cell DNA in chicken embryo kidney (CEK) cells productively infected with chicken embryo lethal orphan (CELO) virus and in human (HEK) cells infected with mutants ts36 and ts125 of human adenovirus type 5 under permissive and restrictive conditions. Cell and viral DNA molecules were separated after CELO virus infection of CEK cells by alkaline sucrose gradient centrifugation, network formation, and CsCl density gradient centrifugation, methods that rely on different properties of the DNA. The cell DNA was then tested for viral sequences by DNA reannealing kinetics. Between 500 and 1,000 viral genome equivalents per cell were found at 36 h postinfection associated with cell DNA purified by each method. These values greatly exceeded the amount of free viral DNA found contaminating cell DNA prepared by the same methods from uninfected cells to which CELO virus DNA had been added. Quantitative agreement in the amounts of viral DNA found associated with cell DNA purified by these different methods suggests that CELO virus DNA is integrated into chick cell DNA during lytic infection. Similar experiments in HEK cells using mutants ts36 and ts125 of adenovirus type 5 at both restrictive and permissive temperatures showed that the same proportion of viral DNA is associated with cell DNA in the absence of viral DNA replication, and this suggests that the difference in the frequency with which cells are transformed by these mutants is not due to a difference in the frequency integration.