JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woodworth-Gutai, M
Right arrow Articles by Lebowitz, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Woodworth-Gutai, M
Right arrow Articles by Lebowitz, J
J Virol. 1976 April; 18(1): 195-204

Introduction of interrupted secondary structure in supercoiled DNA as a function of superhelix density: consideration of hairpin structures in superhelical DNA.

M Woodworth-Gutai and J Lebowitz

ABSTRACT

PM2 DNA was prepared with different superhelical densities (sigma) in order to examine the relationship betweenn supercoiling and the occurrence of a region(s) of unpaired bases in this DNA. A previous study showed that CH3HgOH reacts with native superhelical PM2 DNA more rapidly than the nicked form II. This evaluation of binding, monitored through the change of sedimentation velocity, was repeated on PM2 DNA I with different superhelical densities. Early binding is detected by an increase in sedimentation velocity and occurs with molecules with sigma' values betwee -0.025 and -0.037. The conversion of form I to form II with the single-strand-specific endonuclease from Neurospora crassa also occurs above a sigma value of -0.025. This data strongly supports the view that supercoiling produces interrupted secondary structure. The question whether the interrupted regions remain single stranded in character or form small intrastrand hairpin regions is considered by examining which model best fits the CH3HgOH- induced sedimentation velocity changes and the standard sedimentation velocity versus the superhelical density curve for the in vitro made DNAs. The hairpin model offers the most satisfactory explanations for all the results of this and previous studies.


J Virol. 1976 April; 18(1): 195-204







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1976 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.