JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Incardona, N. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Incardona, N. L.
J Virol. 1974 September; 14(3): 469-478
Copyright © 1974 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Mechanism of Adsorption and Eclipse of Bacteriophage {varphi}X174 III. Comparison of the Activation Parameters for the In Vitro and In Vivo Eclipse Reactions With Mutant and Wild-Type Virus

Nino L. Incardona1

a Department of Chemistry and Institute of Molecular Biophysics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306

ABSTRACT

In a starvation buffer containing 10–3 M divalent cations, {varphi}X174 undergoes viral eclipse above 20 C when attached to intact host cells. An in vitro structural transition that is similar to that observed in this in vivo eclipse reaction occurs over the same temperature range in 0.1 M CaCl2 (pH 7.2). Since both reactions result in a loss of infectivity, their kinetics have been compared in this report. Both exhibit a biphasic first-order loss in PFU that is a result of two competing first-order processes. However, a single type of heterogeneity in the population of virions is not the basis for both competing slower reactions. The Arrhenius plots of the faster components show that the in vitro eclipse reaction has the same activation energy of 35 kcal/mol (ca. 1.47 x 105 J/mol) as the in vivo reaction but a 10-fold lower Arrhenius preexponential factor. This is further evidence that certain features of the in vivo mechanism are retained in the in vitro reaction. In the case of the slower components, the in vitro reaction has an activation energy of 37 kcal/mol (1.55 x 105 J/mol), whereas that of the in vivo reaction is only 5 kcal/mol (2.1 x 104 J/mol). A similar analysis has been performed on a cold-sensitive eclipse mutant of {varphi}X174. In vivo, the mutation is expressed by a two- to three-fold lower Arrhenius preexponential factor for both components of the eclipse reaction when compared to wt virus. The activation energies for both components are the same as wt virus. These results suggest that the mechanism of the eclipse reaction can be operationally divided into two aspects, each subject to mutational alteration.


FOOTNOTES

1 Present address: Microbiology Department, University of Tennessee Medical Units, Memphis, Tenn. 38163.


J Virol. 1974 September; 14(3): 469-478
Copyright © 1974 American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.




This article has been cited by other articles:




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS

Copyright © 1974 by the American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.